You Can’t Rely on AI to Decide if a Bit is Dressage Legal or Not
Over the past 12 months, we’ve noticed a growing trend within the equestrian industry riders are increasingly searching Google or asking AI tools such as ChatGPT questions like:
“Is this bit dressage legal?”
“Can I use this bit in EA dressage?”
“Is the Fager Sally Titanium Baucher legal?”
The concern is that many of the answers now appearing online are not actually coming from official rule books or governing bodies. Instead, they are often being generated from:
Facebook discussions
Forum comments
Social media opinions
Outdated blog posts
Riders interpreting rules incorrectly
AI summaries pulling information from unverified sources
This is becoming a genuine issue because riders are being confidently told a bit is “illegal” when, in reality, the official rules may state otherwise.
Google search results and AI tools are designed to gather information from across the internet and then generate the “most likely” answer based on what they can find.
The problem is that equestrian information online is heavily opinion-based. If enough people repeatedly comment on social media that a certain bit is “not legal,” Google and AI systems may start treating that opinion as fact, even if the official dressage rules say otherwise. Fager Sally Titanium Baucher is dressage legal.
AI does not inherently “understand” the EA or FEI rule books. It simply predicts answers based on patterns in online information. If the internet contains more opinions than official clarifications, the AI answer can become misleading.
A Facebook comment section is not a governing body ruling.
A sponsored rider’s opinion is not an official interpretation of the rule book.
Even retailers, coaches and bit fitters can sometimes misunderstand rules if they rely on hearsay rather than checking the current regulations directly.
This becomes especially problematic because:
Dressage rules can change yearly
FEI and EA rules may differ
Pony Club rules may differ again
Certain mouthpiece variations within the same “style” may be legal while others are not
One small design difference can completely change legality.
Before assuming a bit is legal or illegal, riders should:
Check the current official rule book
Look at the permitted bit diagrams
Confirm wording directly from the governing body
Ask an accredited official if unsure
Be cautious of AI-generated summaries and social media discussions
AI and Google can be useful starting points, but they should never replace the official rules themselves.
As AI-generated search summaries become more common, the equestrian industry is likely to see increasing confusion around tack legality, training advice and horse welfare discussions.
Unfortunately, once incorrect information spreads online repeatedly, it can quickly become treated as “truth” by search engines even when it began as nothing more than a misunderstood Facebook opinion.
That is why it’s becoming increasingly important for riders to:
Verify information properly
Refer back to official sources
And understand that AI does not replace rule books
Because when it comes to competition legality, the official rules will always matter more than what Google or AI happens to summarise online.
Loren Wellings - Accredited Bit Fitter and owner at Horse Bit Emporium
Comments will be approved before showing up.
Designed to stabilise the contact and improve steering, the full cheek bit is a go to for young horses and those needing clearer direction.
"A Pelham is only as strong as its mouthpiece"
Pelham bits are designed for horses that feel strong, inconsistent, or unstable in the contact, where a change in mouthpiece alone is not enough.
A practical guide to choosing the right bit for Australian Ponies, including what to look for, signs of discomfort, and the best bits for sensitive ponies needing comfort and consistent contact.